|
Post by Headmistress on Aug 15, 2010 15:56:22 GMT -5
I would think so, it would be good for organization perhaps, but we can keep track with ips. I don't want to do anything that could ruin the experience, people need an escape. Plus, you never know, it might be very sad for some to find out who everyone is.
|
|
|
Post by Everleigh St. James on Aug 20, 2010 9:11:23 GMT -5
will there be a limit on how many characters one person can have?
|
|
|
Post by Headmistress on Aug 21, 2010 17:35:58 GMT -5
Well, I wasn't really wanting one... :/ Just because I don't think it should be up to me or anyone to decided what someone else can handle...but I was thinking more like guidelines? Like if you have two girl characters your next one must be a boy, or something like that to keep things even. Though one may have as many characters as they can handle. I may put a limit on new members, like maybe they can only have at most 3 characters, just so we don't have a bunch inactive members, though I believe we shall have a system for that, like if you've been inactive for 3 months your account will be deleted or something.
|
|
|
Post by Everleigh St. James on Aug 21, 2010 19:27:15 GMT -5
yay for no charrie limit! i have a tendency to start with one character but somehow soon enough i'll find myself with a gazillion characters. haha.
i love the three months rule! it seems inappropriate. especially since inactive members cluterred the board and face claim (: how about making it equal for new and old members? since i know we don't want them thinking the older member gets special treatments and making dramas between members. how about just every two girls, the next charrie must be a boy.
|
|
|
Post by Everleigh St. James on Aug 21, 2010 19:28:36 GMT -5
yay for no charrie limit! i have a tendency to start with one character but somehow soon enough i'll find myself with a gazillion characters. haha.
i love the three months rule! it seems inappropriate. especially since inactive members cluterred the board and face claim (: how about making it equal for new and old members? since i know we don't want them thinking the older member gets special treatments and making dramas between members. how about just every two girls, the next charrie must be a boy.
|
|
|
Post by Headmistress on Aug 21, 2010 20:42:49 GMT -5
That is wonderful if you have no problems handling them all. ;D I would only make a rule like that so people don't come make a dozen characters and leave, haha. The older members deserve something since they have proven loyalty.
|
|
|
Post by Robert Baldric on Aug 22, 2010 8:14:45 GMT -5
I agree and honestly you can make it a proven thing. In the rules it can say all members may have 2 female, and 1 male charrie. Then after they have proven their loyalty they can get a letter from the headmistress saying they have unlocked the ability of unlimited charries.
What do you think? (thanks for accepting my application)
|
|
|
Post by Headmistress on Aug 22, 2010 21:50:53 GMT -5
Well the reason for the two female characters to at least every one male is because it seems many sites seem to have way, way too many girls in comparison to the boys. Girls are fun, but I can't have them all over, this isn't Beaubaxtons haha. I was thinking of putting something like, There is no character limit, However, if you have two characters of the same sex your next character must be of the opposite sex. Also note that each character must have at least 5 posts(unless minor) within the first month of creation. Any characters that have not have a login within three months shall be deleted, unless notification regarding has been received. ((You're quite welcome, sorry I took so long getting the form up.))
|
|
|
Post by Prince on Aug 25, 2010 18:16:03 GMT -5
That sounds fair. It will even out the girl to boy ratio and keep the board from dying out. Especially like the automatic deletion if you're not active on the board for three months.
|
|
|
Post by Headmistress on Aug 25, 2010 23:51:35 GMT -5
That's what I was hoping for thank you Prince.
|
|
|
Post by Robert Baldric on Aug 27, 2010 19:43:36 GMT -5
It does sound good. It seems like you are giving them the right amount of leeway, without being a push over.
|
|
|
Post by Headmistress on Aug 28, 2010 16:58:22 GMT -5
Thank you, that's what I was going for, for it to be fair and keep things even. I want everyone to be happy, but for things to be orderly.
|
|